How To Tell The Good And Bad About Free Evolution
What is Free Evolution?
Free evolution is the notion that natural processes can cause organisms to develop over time. This includes the development of new species and the alteration of the appearance of existing ones.
Many examples have been given of this, such as different varieties of fish called sticklebacks that can live in salt or fresh water, as well as walking stick insect varieties that prefer specific host plants. These mostly reversible traits permutations do not explain the fundamental changes in basic body plans.
Evolution through Natural Selection
The development of the myriad of living organisms on Earth is a mystery that has intrigued scientists for centuries. Charles Darwin's natural selectivity is the most well-known explanation. This is because individuals who are better-adapted have more success in reproduction and survival than those who are less well-adapted. Over time, a community of well-adapted individuals increases and eventually creates a new species.
Natural selection is a process that is cyclical and involves the interaction of three factors: variation, reproduction and inheritance. Variation is caused by mutation and sexual reproduction both of which enhance the genetic diversity within the species. Inheritance is the transfer of a person's genetic traits to his or her offspring which includes both dominant and recessive alleles. Reproduction is the process of generating fertile, viable offspring. This can be done via sexual or asexual methods.
Natural selection is only possible when all these elements are in balance. For example when a dominant allele at a gene allows an organism to live and reproduce more frequently than the recessive allele the dominant allele will become more prominent in the population. If the allele confers a negative survival advantage or reduces the fertility of the population, it will be eliminated. The process is self-reinforcing, meaning that an organism that has a beneficial trait is more likely to survive and reproduce than one with an inadaptive trait. The more offspring an organism produces the better its fitness, which is measured by its ability to reproduce itself and survive. People with good characteristics, such as having a long neck in giraffes, or bright white patterns on male peacocks, are more likely than others to live and reproduce and eventually lead to them becoming the majority.
Natural selection is only a factor in populations and not on individuals. This is a significant distinction from the Lamarckian evolution theory which holds that animals acquire traits through usage or inaction. For instance, if a giraffe's neck gets longer through stretching to reach prey and its offspring will inherit a more long neck. The difference in neck size between generations will continue to grow until the giraffe is unable to breed with other giraffes.
Evolution through Genetic Drift
In genetic drift, alleles within a gene can be at different frequencies in a group due to random events. Eventually, only one will be fixed (become common enough to no more be eliminated through natural selection) and the other alleles will decrease in frequency. In extreme cases, this leads to one allele dominance. Other alleles have been essentially eliminated and heterozygosity has diminished to zero. In a small group it could lead to the complete elimination of recessive alleles. Such a scenario would be known as a bottleneck effect and it is typical of the kind of evolutionary process that takes place when a large amount of individuals move to form a new population.
A phenotypic bottleneck may also occur when the survivors of a disaster such as an outbreak or mass hunting event are concentrated in the same area. The survivors will have a dominant allele and thus will have the same phenotype. This may be the result of a war, an earthquake, or even a plague. The genetically distinct population, if it is left vulnerable to genetic drift.
Walsh Lewens, Lewens, and Ariew use a "purely outcome-oriented" definition of drift as any deviation from the expected values of differences in fitness. They provide a well-known instance of twins who are genetically identical and have identical phenotypes, and yet one is struck by lightning and dies, while the other lives and reproduces.
This type of drift can play a crucial part in the evolution of an organism. However, it's not the only way to progress. The main alternative is a process called natural selection, in which phenotypic variation in an individual is maintained through mutation and migration.
Stephens asserts that there is a significant distinction between treating drift as a force, or an underlying cause, and considering other causes of evolution, such as mutation, selection and migration as forces or causes. Stephens claims that a causal process account of drift allows us to distinguish it from other forces, and that this distinction is essential. He argues further that drift has an orientation, i.e., it tends towards eliminating heterozygosity. It also has a size, which is determined by the size of the population.
Evolution by Lamarckism
When high school students take biology classes, they are frequently introduced to the work of Jean-Baptiste Lamarck (1744 - 1829). His theory of evolution is often known as "Lamarckism" and it states that simple organisms grow into more complex organisms through the inheritance of characteristics which result from the organism's natural actions, use and disuse. Lamarckism is usually illustrated with an image of a giraffe that extends its neck to reach leaves higher up in the trees. This could cause the longer necks of giraffes to be passed onto their offspring who would grow taller.
Lamarck was a French zoologist and, in his opening lecture for his course on invertebrate Zoology at the Museum of Natural History in Paris on the 17th May 1802, he introduced a groundbreaking concept that radically challenged previous thinking about organic transformation. In his view living things had evolved from inanimate matter via the gradual progression of events. Lamarck wasn't the first to suggest this however he was widely considered to be the first to give the subject a comprehensive and general explanation.
The dominant story is that Charles Darwin's theory of natural selection and Lamarckism were rivals during the 19th century. Darwinism ultimately won which led to what biologists call the Modern Synthesis. This theory denies acquired characteristics are passed down from generation to generation and instead argues organisms evolve by the selective action of environment factors, such as Natural Selection.
While Lamarck endorsed the idea of inheritance through acquired characters, and his contemporaries also offered a few words about this idea however, it was not a major feature in any of their evolutionary theorizing. This is largely due to the fact that it was never tested scientifically.
It's been over 200 years since the birth of Lamarck and in the field of age genomics, there is a growing evidence base that supports the heritability of acquired traits. This is often referred to as "neo-Lamarckism" or more commonly, epigenetic inheritance. This is a variant that is as valid as the popular Neodarwinian model.
Evolution by adaptation
One of the most common misconceptions about evolution is that it is driven by a sort of struggle to survive. This is a false assumption and overlooks other forces that drive evolution. The struggle for survival is more precisely described as a fight to survive in a specific environment, which could include not just other organisms, but also the physical environment itself.
To understand how evolution functions it is beneficial to understand what is adaptation. Adaptation refers to any particular characteristic that allows an organism to survive and reproduce in its environment. It could be a physical feature, like fur or feathers. It could also be a behavior trait that allows you to move to the shade during hot weather, or coming out to avoid the cold at night.
The ability of an organism to draw energy from its environment and interact with other organisms and their physical environments, is crucial to its survival. The organism must possess the right genes to generate offspring, and it must be able to locate enough food and other resources. The organism must also be able to reproduce itself at the rate that is suitable for its specific niche.
These factors, together with mutations and gene flow can cause changes in the proportion of different alleles within the gene pool of a population. This change in allele frequency can result in the emergence of new traits and eventually, new species over time.
Many of the characteristics we admire in plants and animals are adaptations. For example lung or gills that draw oxygen from air feathers and fur for insulation, long legs to run away from predators, and camouflage to hide. To comprehend adaptation, it is important to discern between physiological and behavioral characteristics.
Physical characteristics like thick fur and gills are physical characteristics. Behavior adaptations aren't an exception, 에볼루션 코리아 for instance, 에볼루션 무료체험 에볼루션 바카라 사이트 사이트 (linked resource site) the tendency of animals to seek companionship or move into the shade in hot weather. Furthermore it is important to note that lack of planning does not make something an adaptation. Inability to think about the effects of a behavior, even if it appears to be rational, could make it inflexible.